This has been due, in no small degree, to the influence of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s critically acclaimed Epistemology of the Closet. Working from classic texts of. Epistemology of the Closet has ratings and 54 reviews. Khush said: ‘ Epistemology of the closet’ is an informative and interesting book. It is i. Buy Epistemology of the Closet 2Rev Ed by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery.
|Published (Last):||13 October 2016|
|PDF File Size:||16.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This is the only chapter in whuch lesbianism is the focus; through Albertine’s fluid and less structured homosexual potential, Sedgwick sedgiwck a more modern point of view around homosexuality as a whole.
And if queer is anything, it’s a retort to the idea that your sexual or any identity must define you in a static, limiting way, and above all, that it may be used to vilify you. The chapter dedicated to tbe king of obscurity is the one closest to ‘pure’ literary analysis. As a group we parade and champion acceptance, but behind the confines of our paper partitions, we do not often accept one another for our variations on the same theme.
Well, Eve Sedgwick is brilliant, as always, although her literary analysis is certainly a much lass breezier read than the amazing and much-assigned introduction and first chapter of xloset book. This is a very accurate assessment, both in terms of content sedfwick regarding the form of Epistemology of the Closet. She is wearing a pretty dress, and an alice band; a toothy grin lights up her face. He hasn’t come out to his parents, but has come out to his American friends and classmates, as well as some of his close female cousins.
The meaning of the I was very fascinated with the way the author expressed they way in which ksofsky closet was stablished her point of view and understanding of the closet as an epistemology. My library Help Advanced Book Search. Feb 05, Jamie Bernthal rated it really liked it. The predominantly US-based activism alongside queer theory — born out of a frustration with lesbian and gay movements that were closeet as assimilationist, seeking the approval of dominant heterosexual society rather than challenging it — was intentionally provocative and confrontational.
La Rochefoucauld wrote “There are some people who would never have fallen in love if they had not heard there was such a thing” – does the same go for hate as goes for love? Even more impressive was here ability to enter int This was an amazing and ghe readable work.
I don’t know that I’ve ever read a book I liked as much as this one for the first pages. To think, read or act queerly is to think across boundaries, beyond what is deemed to be normal, to jump at the possibilities opened up by celebrating marginality, which kosofsmy itself serves to destabilise the mainstream. And that the ghe was rested to protect us from the harm of those whom didn’t understand us, or wouldn’t welcomes us. A universalizing view affirms that all persons are elistemology equal worth, though they may differ in many ways, and that an understanding of homosexuality is important for people of all sexual persuasions.
Epistemology of the Closet: In fact, on my second reading of epistmeology chapters, I tried to read them as if I were not familiar epistemoolgy their works, they are still accessible. Through this and various other examples, Sedgwick reveals that several sexual contradictions result in modern misunderstanding.
Sedgwick is not writing a pop history book for anyone interested in LGBT studies. Overall, this is a difficult text that fights the reader almost line by line. It has been a while now since I have read through Eve Sedgewick’s Epistemology of the Closet and while I closett have lost some of the particulars and nuances into the receding oblivion, the impact it has made on my world view persists. Part of the problem is that I haven’t read a lot of the texts by dead white men that she analyzes, and that made some of the later chapters incredibly difficult to get though.
Hardwickwhere the majority decision cites a seemingly unbro As much as this book has been named as one of the founding works of the queer theory and discourse, it is not dull and is still relevant in it subject today. This strand of critical thinking emerged in the late 80s kosofskt early 90s, deliberately appropriating the term of abuse usually hurled at gay people “queer” in order to challenge its offensive meaning.
Jan 13, Pedro Magdaleno rated it really liked it.
Epistemology of the Closet by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. Nov 11, Zacharygs rated it really liked it. Return to Book Page. I like theory and academicalness as much as they next girl see “N.
Works from the likes of James, Wilde, Proust, Melville, among other are looked at as means to examine how sexual issues have been addressed in literature, and how such works represent a greater context that speaks towards factors that shape the manner in which sexuality is defined.
The content in it is, after all, the work of a lifetime. How would someone grow to hate themselves or to sergwick others for their differences, if someone aeons ago had not given voice, conceived of such a word, as defines something to be hated? Working from classic texts of European and American writers – including Melville, James, Nietzsche, Proust, and Wilde – Sedgwick analyzes a turn-of-the-century historical moment in which sexual koofsky became or important a demarcation of personhood as gender had been for centuries.
Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. The words kosovsky, which introduce in Butler’s inimitable style the idea of gender as performance, have best been summarised, I think, by the internet meme of a photograph of Butler delivering a lecture, overlaid with the words ” Gender thee yer ‘doing’ it “. Feb 15, l. Another analogy that I came across was the fact we as queer people did fall under closet ideology.
It will not be an easy read. Order by newest oldest recommendations. In the introduction, Sedgwick presents sedgwuck — “assumptions and conclusions from a long-term project of anti-homophobic episgemology — that inform her book’s project. This has been due, in no small degree, to the influence of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s critically acclaimed Epistemology of the Closet. So why did it strike such a chord with this straight girl?
But Oooooooh what a difficult read!