ISO/IEC defines quality in use measures for the characteristics defined in ISO/IEC , and is intended to be used together with ISO/IEC ISO/IEC. FDIS. Information technology — Software product quality —. Part 1: Quality model. Technologies de l’information — Qualité. Presenta una reflexión sobre las consideraciones y recomendaciones que se deben tener en cuenta para evaluar los criterios de calidad del Modelo.
|Published (Last):||20 April 2010|
|PDF File Size:||2.69 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
List of International Electrotechnical Commission standards. The proposed quality in use measures are primarily intended to be used for quality assurance and management of systems and software products based on their effects when actually used.
ISO has eight product quality characteristics in contrast to ISO ‘s six wstandar, and 31 subcharacteristics.
Life cycle A standard is reviewed every 5 years 00 Preliminary. Each quality sub-characteristic e. The measures are eshandar to the use of any human-computer system, including both computer systems in use and esttandar products that form part of the system.
Compared to”security” and “compatibility” were added as main characteristics. This may be done, for example, by specifying target values for quality metrics which evaluates the degree of presence of quality attributes.
They are not intended to be an exhaustive set. ISO standards by standard number. Authors must complete, sign, and submit the Review and Publication Authorization Form of the manuscript provided by the Journal; this form should contain all the originality and copyright information of the manuscript. The Journal allows and invites authors to publish their work in repositories or on their website after the presentation of the number in which the work is published with the estnadar of generating greater dissemination of the work.
This page was last edited on 12 Septemberat Downloads Download data is not yet estanndar.
Proof sent to secretariat or FDIS ballot initiated: This standard stems from the GE model for describing software quality, presented in by McCall et al.
Quick jump to page content. Views Read Edit View history. Sistema OJS3 – Metabiblioteca.
Check out our FAQs. The main users of the measurement results are people managing development, acquisition, evaluation, or maintenance of software and systems. Vol 22 Estanxar 35 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. An attribute is an entity which can be verified or measured in the software product.
Monday to Friday – The ideas and assertions expressed by the authors estandra their solely responsibility and do not represent the views and opinions of the Journal or its editors. Ideally, the internal quality determines the external quality and external quality determines quality in use. Software product is defined in a broad sense: Published Jul 5, Some attributes could have a desirable range of values, which does not depend estandr specific user needs but depends on generic factors, for example, human cognitive factors.
The journal authorizes the total or partial reproduction of the published article, as long as the source, including the name of the Journal, author syear, volume, issue, and pages are cited. Attributes are not defined in the standard, as they vary estandr different software products.
Quality-in-use metrics are only available when the final product is used in real conditions.
It does not assign ranges of values of the measures to rated levels or to grades of compliance because these values are defined for each system or product depending, on the context of use and users’ needs. Final text received or FDIS registered for formal approval.
Use British English Oxford spelling from January Licence The journal authorizes the total or partial reproduction of the published article, as long as the source, including the name of the Journal, author syear, volume, issue, estanfar pages are cited.
On doing so, however, it leaves up to each organization the task of specifying precisely its own model.
These biases include changing priorities after the start of a project or not having any clear definitions of “success”.