God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason is a book by the Dutch philosopher Herman Philipse, written in English and published in the. Given, however, that we are living in the age of science, Philipse argues that the natural theologian is faced with a dilemma he calls “The. God in the Age of Science?: A Critique Of Religious Reason. by. Herman Philipse . Philipse tackles religion from an epistemilogical point of view whereas most.
|Published (Last):||17 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.82 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This section offers critiques of cosmological arguments, arguments from design and an assortment of other arguments and their defenses, concluding with a chapter on if experience that refutes the attempt to shift the burden of proof to phliipse non-believer Philipse’s vigorous public atheism has, unsurprisingly, brought phipipse into conflict with Islamists in the Netherlands.
Probably the best ones on the subject, and certainly the most expensive: Preview — God in the Age of Science? Retrieved July 14, Finally, if evidence is needed, should its evidential support be assessed by the same logical criteria that we use in evaluating evidence in science, or not? The end result predictably is that Swinburne’s approach simply doesn’t have the predictive power attributed to it.
Find it on Scholar. The question the book explores is what to make of a concept like God in light of modern science, and is largely an exploration of the case made by the philosopher Richard Swinburne.
Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life Harrington, Sacra Pagina Liturgical Press, Clement Dore – – Religious Studies 18 4: A second and related problem concerns domains, especially the proper domain of what is meant by God in natural theology and the domain of science. To purchase, visit your preferred ebook provider.
Sscience Login Email Address. Bernard Neary rated it really liked it Feb 21, Carl rated it it was amazing Jan 10, Clarendon Press, God in the Age of Science? In doing so he presents a very strong case for atheism. Mar 26, Ester marked it as to-read Shelves: Philipse uses this slender claim to support his case that there are contradictions within the Ags Testament that make any revealed theology drawn from it unreliable, but in theology, as in science, a single counterexample, even if genuine, rarely suffices in itself to overthrow a paradigm.
Consider, however, the last part of Philipse’s claim, part of his attack on Swinburne’s argument that laws of nature can be brought into operation by God. In Part Pholipse, Herman Philipse assesses the tenability of each of these strategies and argues that the most promising option for believers who want to be justified in accepting their creed in our scientific age is the Bayesian cumulative case strategy developed by Richard Swinburne.
Each of these options has been defended by prominent analytic philosophers of religion. Atheist Manifesto Breaking the Spell: To adapt the metaphor of the doomed bird in the air pump on the cover, even if Philipse has succeeded in killing off the bird read now as a symbol of Swinburne’s theory of theismit is not apparent what he has left behind, apart from a vacuum.
This is absolutely the best book on this subject. Herman Philipse Utrecht University. I was also left curious to know what possibilities Philipse himself advocates or might be willing to accept as an impersonal uncaused cause or causes of the cosmos, or whether he thinks the reliability of our inferences in trying to resolve such questions simply breaks down at some point.
This is in contrast to revealed theology the specific doctrines of theistic religions and in contrast to the idea that theology is a pseudodiscipline.
Wielenberg – – Religious Studies 46 4: Books by Herman Philipse. Philipse found his Atheist Manifesto to be too hastily and superficially written, and decided to set up a more complete work to systematically refute all the arguments for the existence of God and adherence to any form of theism. For this reason, philosophers in the past who constructed very diverse arguments relating to God, such as Thomas Aquinas or David Hume, were similar insofar as they prioritized the issue of causation.
Open Preview See a Problem?
By the latter he means we should conclude that:. In English, he has written over a dozen articles in philosophical journals, as well as a philiipse assessment of Heidegger, Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being: Based on his critiques of the last two cases “God is supernatural ” and “God’s existence is within reach of natural theology ” he concludes that: His Atheist Manifesto was republished in an expanded edition in with a foreword by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who partly credits the book for her shift from Islam to atheism.
Philipse does his best to argue for the relevance of natural theology as the approach one ought to take, and he aimed at the best natural theology has to offer in his arguments. Classical, Early, and Medieval World History: Probabilistic Confirmation Theory and the Existence of God.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. Philipse devotes chapter 1 and parts of chapter 10 to this task, but many of the arguments he puts forward in his critique of revealed theology are too brief and superficial to establish credibility with his colleagues in those areas of the academy that specialize in such matters.
Nevertheless, it should also be pointed out that many theists would actually agree with Philipse’s criticisms. Classical, Early, and Medieval Prose and Writers: Yujin Nagasawa – – Philosophy Compass 6 8: Philipse tackles religion from an epistemilogical point of view whereas most of the ‘new atheists’ write from a non-philosophical pamphlet point of view, for example: Philipse goes about this ambitious task in a series of commendably clear steps.
In chapters 6, 9, 10, 11 and at many other points he argues repeatedly that theism has no significant predictive power and compares it unfavourably with science on this basis.